Bowles, Adm'r. v. Sandycrest Terraces

Oregon Supreme Court

Bowles, Adm'r. v. Sandycrest Terraces

191 P.2d 380, 183 Or. 147, 1948 Ore. LEXIS 158

DecidedFebruary 17, 1948

StatusPublished

This text of 191 P.2d 380 (Bowles, Adm'r. v. Sandycrest Terraces) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowles, Adm'r. v. Sandycrest Terraces, 191 P.2d 380, 183 Or. 147, 1948 Ore. LEXIS 158 (Or. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

BAILEY, J.

This action was commenced on the 26th day of January, 1945, by Chester Bowles, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, pursuant to § 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act (56 Stat. 23) as amended (58 Stat. 632, 50 U. S. C. App. Supp. V, 901, et seq.), against Sandycrest Terraces, a corporation, to recover statutory damages *148 for overceiling rents allegedly collected by defendants in violation of tbe applicable rent regulations.

Tbe facts, so far as material on this appeal, and the legal questions are the same as those set forth in the Mittleman case this day decided, wherein our views on the numerous matters therein and here involved are set forth at length, with the exception that the application for the substitution of Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Office of Temporary Controls, as party plaintiff, in the place and stead of Chester Bowles, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, was made on February 17, 1947. The decision in that case is controlling in this one. Therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAILEY, J.

This action was commenced on the 26th day of January, 1945, by Chester Bowles, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, pursuant to § 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act (56 Stat. 23) as amended (58 Stat. 632, 50 U. S. C. App. Supp. V, 901, et seq.), against Sandycrest Terraces, a corporation, to recover statutory damages *148 for overceiling rents allegedly collected by defendants in violation of tbe applicable rent regulations.

Tbe facts, so far as material on this appeal, and the legal questions are the same as those set forth in the Mittleman case this day decided, wherein our views on the numerous matters therein and here involved are set forth at length, with the exception that the application for the substitution of Philip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Office of Temporary Controls, as party plaintiff, in the place and stead of Chester Bowles, Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, was made on February 17, 1947. The decision in that case is controlling in this one. Therefore the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 P.2d 380, 183 Or. 147, 1948 Ore. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowles-admr-v-sandycrest-terraces-or-1948.