Bowler v. Young
78 F. App'x 281
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bowler v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 F. App'x 187 →
Opinion
Joseph Bowler appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bowler v. Young, No. CA-03-394-7 (W.D.Va. June 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowler v. Young, 78 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2003).
78 F. App'x 281 (Bowler v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983