Bowler v. Maine

First Circuit

Bowler v. Maine

13 F. App'x 9

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 2001

DocketNo. 00-2010

StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 9 (Bowler v. Maine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowler v. Maine, 13 F. App'x 9 (1st Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion. To clarify one misunderstanding voiced by plaintiff: although the Eleventh Amendment by its terms refers only to suits against a State by citizens of another State, the Supreme Court has “extended the Amendment’s applicability to suits by citizens against their own States.” Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 121 S.Ct. 955, 962, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001); accord, e.g., Strahan v. Coxe, 127 F.3d 155, 166 (1st Cir.1997).

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion. To clarify one misunderstanding voiced by plaintiff: although the Eleventh Amendment by its terms refers only to suits against a State by citizens of another State, the Supreme Court has “extended the Amendment’s applicability to suits by citizens against their own States.” Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 121 S.Ct. 955, 962, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001); accord, e.g., Strahan v. Coxe, 127 F.3d 155, 166 (1st Cir.1997).

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowler-v-maine-ca1-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack