Bowler v. Governor of Maine

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

May 26, 1992
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

___________________

No. 92-1222

EUGENE B. BOWLER,

                                Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                          v.

                              GOVERNOR OF MAINE, ET AL.,

                                Defendant, Appellees.

                                  __________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

                     [Hon. David M. Cohen, U.S. Magistrate Judge]
                                           _____________________

                                 ___________________

                                        Before

                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,
                                         ___________
                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                     ____________________
                              and Selya, Circuit Judge.
                                         _____________

                                 ___________________

               Eugene B. Bowler on brief pro se.
               ________________
               Michael  E.  Carpenter,  Attorney  General,  and  Peter   H.
               ______________________                            __________
          Stewart, Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.
          _______

__________________

                                 __________________ 
                 Per Curiam.  We  have reviewed the parties's  briefs and
                 __________

            the  record on  appeal.    We  affirm  the  judgment  of  the

            magistrate judge essentially  for the reasons  stated in  the

            memorandum decision and order, dated February 14, 1992.

                 Affirmed.
                 _________