Bowler v. Commissioner of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife

536 A.2d 97, 1988 Me. LEXIS 5
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedFebruary 1, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 536 A.2d 97 (Bowler v. Commissioner of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowler v. Commissioner of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife, 536 A.2d 97, 1988 Me. LEXIS 5 (Me. 1988).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The plaintiff, Eugene Bowler, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Knox County, dismissing his complaint seeking to enjoin the issuance of permits to kill fawns. On appeal, Bowler contends that (1) the Legislature has not authorized the killing of fawns and (2) the killing of fawns constitutes an unconstitutional taking of private property. Finding no merit in either of these contentions, we affirm the judgment. See State v. McKinnon, 153 Me. 15, 18, 133 A.2d 885, 887 (1957).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McKinnon
133 A.2d 885 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 A.2d 97, 1988 Me. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowler-v-commissioner-of-inland-fisheries-wildlife-me-1988.