Bowlby v. Thunder
3 A. 588, 2 Sadler 191
This text of 3 A. 588 (Bowlby v. Thunder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowlby v. Thunder, 3 A. 588, 2 Sadler 191 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
We see no error in the admission, nor in the rejection, of evidence. The alterations in the dates were sufficiently noted on the deed to make it proper evidence; and no sufficient evidence was given or offered to change its effect.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ipser v. Kessler
3 Pelt. 142 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)
Carriere v. Morris Building & Land Improvement Ass'n
10 Teiss. 153 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1913)
Thoms v. Sewell
30 La. Ann. 359 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 A. 588, 2 Sadler 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowlby-v-thunder-pa-1886.