Bowlby v. Thunder
3 A. 588, 2 Sadler 191
Opinion
We see no error in the admission, nor in the rejection, of evidence. The alterations in the dates were sufficiently noted on the deed to make it proper evidence; and no sufficient evidence was given or offered to change its effect.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowlby v. Thunder, 3 A. 588, 2 Sadler 191 (Pa. 1886).
3 A. 588 (Bowlby v. Thunder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ipser v. Kessler
3 Pelt. 142 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1919)
Carriere v. Morris Building & Land Improvement Ass'n
10 Teiss. 153 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1913)
Thoms v. Sewell
30 La. Ann. 359 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1878)