Bowland v. State

622 So. 2d 1009, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4988, 1993 WL 144084
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1993
DocketNo. 92-01419
StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 1009 (Bowland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowland v. State, 622 So. 2d 1009, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4988, 1993 WL 144084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his sentence imposed after violation of probation. With a one-cell bump for the violation of proba[1010]*1010tion, the trial court's sentence, 4¾⅛ years’ incarceration, is within the permissible range. The trial court, however, did not allow credit for time served on another offense for which the defendant had received an incarcerative sentence at the same time he was sentenced to probation for this offense. The trial court followed our holding in State v. Tripp, 591 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The supreme court recently reversed that decision. Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a determination of credit for time served, following the supreme court’s decision in Tripp.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tripp
591 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 So. 2d 1009, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4988, 1993 WL 144084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowland-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.