Bowland v. State

622 So. 2d 1009, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4988, 1993 WL 144084
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1993·No. No. 92-01419·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his sentence imposed after violation of probation. With a one-cell bump for the violation of proba[1010]*1010tion, the trial court's sentence, 4¾⅛ years’ incarceration, is within the permissible range. The trial court, however, did not allow credit for time served on another offense for which the defendant had received an incarcerative sentence at the same time he was sentenced to probation for this offense. The trial court followed our holding in State v. Tripp, 591 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The supreme court recently reversed that decision. Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a determination of credit for time served, following the supreme court’s decision in Tripp.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowland v. State, 622 So. 2d 1009, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4988, 1993 WL 144084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

622 So. 2d 1009 (Bowland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tripp
591 So. 2d 1055 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)