Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
491 A.2d 436, 4 Conn. App. 68, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 953
Opinion
On February 19, 1985, our Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Appellate Session of the Superior Court in this case and remanded the case to this court1 with direction to reinstate the trial [69]*69court’s judgment of dismissal. Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 195 Conn. 276, 487 A.2d 559 (1985).
Pursuant to, and in conformity with, that remand, we hereby reinstate the judgment of the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 491 A.2d 436, 4 Conn. App. 68, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 953 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).
491 A.2d 436 (Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campformio v. Greenwich Pzc, No. Cv99 0170237 S (Apr. 19, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5472 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Jurczenia v. Planning Zoning Comm'n, No. Cv91 0118919 S (Jul. 17, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 6780 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)