Bowker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bowker v. State

1926 OK CR 216, 247 P. 634, 35 Okla. Crim. 73, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 282

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 15, 1926

DocketNo. A-5472.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 216 (Bowker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowker v. State, 1926 OK CR 216, 247 P. 634, 35 Okla. Crim. 73, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 282 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On an information charging in Pawnee county, August 8, 1924, Harry Bowker did have in his possession three gallons of whisky with the unlawful intent to sell the same, he was convicted, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and to be confined in the county jail for 90 days. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court *74 March 10, 1925, petition in error with case-made. No briefs have been filed, and when the case reached final submission, it was submitted on the record.

An examination of the record leaves no reasonable question in our minds as to the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the submission to the jury of the question as to defendant’s guilt; and, finding no material error, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On an information charging in Pawnee county, August 8, 1924, Harry Bowker did have in his possession three gallons of whisky with the unlawful intent to sell the same, he was convicted, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $250 and to be confined in the county jail for 90 days. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this court *74 March 10, 1925, petition in error with case-made. No briefs have been filed, and when the case reached final submission, it was submitted on the record.

An examination of the record leaves no reasonable question in our minds as to the sufficiency of the evidence to justify the submission to the jury of the question as to defendant’s guilt; and, finding no material error, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 216, 247 P. 634, 35 Okla. Crim. 73, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowker-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.