Bowie v. Talbot
This text of 3 F. Cas. 1070 (Bowie v. Talbot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
overruled the objections, saying that it is not reasonable that the. party should have all the benefits of being . present in court, and not- liable to its disadvantages. The benefit of the net might be entirely avoided by the party concealing himself, or the opposite party may not know . his residence. 'But THE COURT, not being satisfied that the witness had departed and was out .of the District of Columbia at the time of the trial, rejected the deposition; upon which, a juror was withdrawn by consent, and the cause continued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 F. Cas. 1070, 1 Cranch 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowie-v-talbot-circtddc-1805.