Bowie v. Hunter

3 F. Cas. 1069, 4 D.C. 699, 4 Cranch 699

This text of 3 F. Cas. 1069 (Bowie v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowie v. Hunter, 3 F. Cas. 1069, 4 D.C. 699, 4 Cranch 699 (circtddc 1836).

Opinion

But the Court

(Cranch, C. J., contra:,)

permitted the evidence to be given. The reason stated by Morsell, J., was, that, perhaps, a knowledge of such declarations may, by the evidence, be brought home to the plaintiff.

Mr. Brent moved for a new trial, and cited 5 Binney, 109; 3 Wheeler, 260.

But the Court refused to grant it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 F. Cas. 1069, 4 D.C. 699, 4 Cranch 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowie-v-hunter-circtddc-1836.