Bowie v. Davis

33 La. Ann. 345
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1881
DocketNo. 8190
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 33 La. Ann. 345 (Bowie v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowie v. Davis, 33 La. Ann. 345 (La. 1881).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Levy, J.

Appellee moves to dismiss this appeal on the following-grounds:

1st. Because appellant obtained on November 5th, 1880, on motion-in open court, an order for both a suspensive and devolutive appeal,., returnable to the Supreme Court on the 2d Monday of November, 1880,. and failed to file the record in this Court on said return day, or within three judicial days thereafter, which failure operated an abandonment of said appeals, both suspensive and devolutive, and for this reason, the • second devolutive appeal, taken by petition by appellant on 10th July, 1880, was illegal and of no effect, the judgment appealed from having-become final and irrevocable by said abandonment.

2d. Diminution of record.

By consent of parties, the second ground has been abandoned.

“ The inability or the omission of the plaintiff to furnish a bond andfulfil the condition precedent on which a suspensive appeal was granted,, did not preclude the party from applying within the year for a devolutive appeal. The jurisdiction of this Court attaches only when the-bond is filed.” 2 An. Gibson vs. Selby, 630. See, also, 15 An. 592; 20 An., Mortee vs. Edwards, 236.

[348]*348“ Appellant gave no bond under the order for a suspensive appeal, 'but gave bond after getting an order for a devolutive appeal. This was not an abandonment of an appeal. There is no appeal until the bond is given, it matters not how many orders of appeal have been granted.” Bank of America vs. Fortier, 27 An. 244.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Succession of Reynolds
91 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Buillard v. Davis
197 So. 273 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1940)
Vacuum Oil Co. v. Cockrell
148 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
Rosenthal v. Rosenthal
106 So. 385 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1925)
Day v. Goff
2 La. App. 75 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Braud v. Huth
98 So. 664 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)
Durand v. Landry
48 So. 307 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 La. Ann. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowie-v-davis-la-1881.