BOWIE-McCREADY v. MORRISTOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Supreme Court of New Jersey

BOWIE-McCREADY v. MORRISTOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

970 A.2d 1043, 199 N.J. 124, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 523

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 6, 2009

DocketA-66 September Term 2008, 63, 318

StatusPublished

This text of 970 A.2d 1043 (BOWIE-McCREADY v. MORRISTOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

BOWIE-McCREADY v. MORRISTOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, 970 A.2d 1043, 199 N.J. 124, 2009 N.J. LEXIS 523 (N.J. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter having come before the Court on a grant of defendant’s petition for certification, and the Court having been informed by counsel for plaintiff that the property in question had been sold to the Passaic River Coalition, which had granted to the county a historic preservation easement on the property,

And plaintiffs-respondents having argued that the within appeal had been rendered moot by the transfer of the affected property,

And defendant Morristown Zoning Board of Adjustment having argued that the Court should retain jurisdiction to address the issues raised in its petition for certification,

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI