Bowie & Kurtz v. Wheelright
3 F. Cas. 1070, 2 D.C. 167, 2 Cranch 167
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1819
StatusPublished
This text of 3 F. Cas. 1070 (Bowie & Kurtz v. Wheelright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowie & Kurtz v. Wheelright, 3 F. Cas. 1070, 2 D.C. 167, 2 Cranch 167 (circtddc 1819).
Opinion
decided that the charter-party, not containing an express averment that the vessel was seaworthy, could not support the averment of such a covenant in the declaration.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 F. Cas. 1070, 2 D.C. 167, 2 Cranch 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowie-kurtz-v-wheelright-circtddc-1819.