Bowie & Kurtz v. Blacklock
3 F. Cas. 1069, 2 D.C. 265, 2 Cranch 265
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1821·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
overruled the opinion before given, and instructed the jury that the holder of the note was only bound to call at the usual place of business of the defendant, in business hours; and if it be shut, and no person there to receive notice, the holder is excused for not giving notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowie & Kurtz v. Blacklock, 3 F. Cas. 1069, 2 D.C. 265, 2 Cranch 265 (circtddc 1821).
3 F. Cas. 1069 (Bowie & Kurtz v. Blacklock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Morgan
99 F. 570 (Fourth Circuit, 1900)