Bowes v. State

23 Misc. 2d 772, 204 N.Y.S.2d 240
New York Court of Claims·Decided August 8, 1960·No. Claim No. 36152; Claim No. 36153; Claim No. 36297; Claim No. 36321; Claim No. 36322·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Richard S. Heller, J.

All of these claims arise from a two-car accident which occurred on September 7, 1958, at about 6:00 p.m., when the car owned and operated by claimant Jane Pace in a westerly direction on Route 17, a State highway, went out of control and crossed over into the eastbound lane immediately in front of a car owned and operated by Gerald T. Bowes. Esther M. Bowes, Clayton Jacobson, and Wilma Jacobson were passengers in the Bowes car. Both cars were damaged and all claimants were seriously injured.

Claimant Jane Pace was driving her 1953 Chevrolet two-door sedan from Owego to Nichols to visit her sister. As she proceeded at 35-45 miles per hour on her right side of the road up a long hill known as the Devil’s Elbow Hill, the visibility was good. It had been raining earlier but the rain had stopped, leaving the pavement wet in spots. Suddenly, she felt a bump, and the steering wheel was pulled from her hands. Her car instantly pulled to the left, shot directly across the highway into the path of the Bowes car, and the collision occurred.

It is the contention of claimant Jane Pace that her car dropped into a hole on the north side of the pavement and caused her to lose control of the car.

Claimant Gerald F. Bowes was driving easterly on Route 17 and was descending the hill at a speed of approximately 30 miles per hour. He was on his right side of the road when the Pace car came across the highway in front of him. He had no opportunity to stop before the collision occurred.

Route 17 is the main State highway of southern New York running from New York City to western New York. It is established by the State’s own witness that this highway carried a heavy truck load and that it was a main artery of traffic. The highway is 20 feet in width with a bituminous top composition placed over a concrete base. The hill was one half mile long and the alignment from the top of. the hill to the bottom was nearly straight.

It is established that the north edge of the highway was jagged, rough and uneven, and that adjacent to the edge were holes which seemed to be in the paved portion of the highway and immediately in front of the paved portion when it cut back into a narrower highway. It is also established that the shoulder [774] adjacent to the broken north edge of the highway was 4 to 4% inches lower than the highway. It is further established that the condition of the north edge of the highway and the condition of the shoulder of the highway existed for a period of several months. It is also established that the ragged, uneven north edge of the highway extended the full length of the hill. It is established that the blacktop was paved beyond the original concrete base and that this paving had settled toward the dirt shoulder.

Since the condition of the highway and shoulder had been the same for several months, it is the conclusion of the court that the State knew or should have known of this condition. The fact that the entire north edge of the highway was broken and irregular for one half mile up this steep grade on a heavily traveled road indicates a lack of inspection and maintenance.

Claimant Jane Pace was driving near the north edge of the pavement and had a right to expect that the paved portion of the highway was safe for travel and that the shoulder was available for emergency use. The court can visualize circumstances where a broken pavement or a jagged pavement or an irregular edge of the highway or a slanting paved adjunct to the main highway or a depressed shoulder might be insufficient to charge negligence, but where you have a combination of all of these conditions present at one time the conclusion of negligence is inescapable.

The court finds that claimant Jane Pace was not guilty of any negligence which contributed to the accident. It is true that it was light and the road was straight and that if she had nothing else to do she might have observed the holes in the road. However, with a wet pavement and shoulder there is less visual distinction of highway edges and shoulders. Claimant Pace had an additional job in observing east-going, fast-moving traffic, consisting of cars and tractor-trailers, on a steep hill with which she had limited knowledge. The court also finds that the other claimants were free of any contributory negligence.

It is the opinion of the court that the negligence of the State in the care and maintenance of this highway was the sole proximate cause of the accident.

As a result of the accident, claimant Jane Pace, then 28 years of age, suffered personal injuries including severe shock, a concussion, lacerations of the face and the right thigh, injury to the right kidney which resulted in internal bleeding, fracture of the tenth and eleventh ribs on the right side, and multiple fractures of the pelvis. She was confined to the hospital for [775]*77543 days and was totally disabled 12 weeks. As a result of the fractures of the pelvis, the bone has a permanent deformity which could well cause difficulty for Miss Pace in future years. Her special damages amount to $2,546.66 and include $600 for lost wages and $700 stipulated damages to her automobile. Claimant Pace is entitled to an award in the sum of $13,500 for all damages, past, present and future.

Claimant' Gerald Bowes, 59 years of age at the time of the accident, was in good health at that time. His employment involved bending over, squatting, lifting, and required him to be on his feet throughout the day. His injuries consisted of a comminuted fracture of the right knee which necessitated the removal of the patella. Claimant also had fractures of the fourth, fifth, and sixth ribs on the right. There were other injuries of a minor nature. He was hospitalized until September 20 and was disabled until January 7, 1959, when he returned' to work' after losing 18 weeks. It is indicated that there is a permanent atrophy of the right thigh with limitation of flexion and range of motion of the knee. The special damages for Gerald Bowes individually amount to $2,363.70 and include lost wages in the amount of $900, the stipulated damage to the car of $250 and the balance of $1,213.70 in medical and hospital bills. In addition, Gerald expended for Mrs. Bowes and is entitled, therefore, to special damages in the amount of $1,169.90. Claimant is entitled to an award in the sum of $16,000 for all damages, past, present and future.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowes v. State, 23 Misc. 2d 772, 204 N.Y.S.2d 240 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

23 Misc. 2d 772 (Bowes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pace v. State
14 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)