Bowes v. Ott

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Bowes v. Ott

223 N.W. 452, 198 Wis. 55, 1929 Wisc. LEXIS 83

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided February 5, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The following opinion was filed February 5, 1929:

Owen, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Vinje did not participate in this case. The Justices participating are equally divided. Mr. Justice Eschweiler, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and Mr. Justice Crownhart are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Stevens, and the writer are of the opinion that it should be affirmed. Under the established rule, this results in an af-firmance of the judgment.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on April 2, 1929.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following opinion was filed February 5, 1929:

Owen, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Vinje did not participate in this case. The Justices participating are equally divided. Mr. Justice Eschweiler, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and Mr. Justice Crownhart are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Stevens, and the writer are of the opinion that it should be affirmed. Under the established rule, this results in an af-firmance of the judgment.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied, with $25 costs, on April 2, 1929.

Bowes v. Ott, 223 N.W. 452, 198 Wis. 55, 1929 Wisc. LEXIS 83 (Wis. 1929).

Pincite

223 N.W. 452 (Bowes v. Ott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related