Bowery Savings Bank v. Mel & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bowery Savings Bank v. Mel & Sons, Inc.

248 A.D. 734

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 734 (Bowery Savings Bank v. Mel & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowery Savings Bank v. Mel & Sons, Inc., 248 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from order dated March 1, 1936, settling the account of the receiver in a foreclosure action and directing that the balance in his hands, after the payment of commissions and attorney’s fees, be turned over to plaintiff; from order of April 1, 1936, as amended on reargument, in so far as it adheres to the original decision and denies the motion of defendant Mel & Sons, Inc., in all other respects; and from order dated April 15, 1936, in so far as it directs that the motion for resettlement of the order of April 1, 1936, be in all other respects denied. Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from order dated March 1, 1936, settling the account of the receiver in a foreclosure action and directing that the balance in his hands, after the payment of commissions and attorney’s fees, be turned over to plaintiff; from order of April 1, 1936, as amended on reargument, in so far as it adheres to the original decision and denies the motion of defendant Mel & Sons, Inc., in all other respects; and from order dated April 15, 1936, in so far as it directs that the motion for resettlement of the order of April 1, 1936, be in all other respects denied. Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowery-savings-bank-v-mel-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1936.