Bowers v. Yancey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Bowers v. Yancey

85 So. 704, 204 Ala. 423, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 214

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 30, 1920

Docket7 Div. 85.

StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 704 (Bowers v. Yancey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowers v. Yancey, 85 So. 704, 204 Ala. 423, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 214 (Ala. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

Statutory action of ejectment by appellee against appellant. The fact that appellant was in possession holding adversely did not affect the admissibility or probative force of the deeds under which appellee showed^ title. Code, § 3839; Nichols v. Nichols, 179 Ala. 611, 60 South. 855; (Reichert v. Sheip, 85 South. 267, 1 The cases cited by appellant arose prior to the change in the statute law now appearing in the section of the Code supra.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BROWN, JJ., concur.

1

Ante, p. 86.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAYRE, J.

Statutory action of ejectment by appellee against appellant. The fact that appellant was in possession holding adversely did not affect the admissibility or probative force of the deeds under which appellee showed^ title. Code, § 3839; Nichols v. Nichols, 179 Ala. 611, 60 South. 855; (Reichert v. Sheip, 85 South. 267, 1 The cases cited by appellant arose prior to the change in the statute law now appearing in the section of the Code supra.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BROWN, JJ., concur.

1

Ante, p. 86.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 704, 204 Ala. 423, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-yancey-ala-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack