Bowers v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.
297 F. 225, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 3883, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2814, 4 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 3883
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 4, 1924·No. No. 211·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Remembering that changes in treasury decisions do not change the law, but merely announce a change in the opinion about the law of some official, we are of opinion that the decisions in Edwards v. Wabash Ry. (C. C. A.) 264 Fed. 610, Trumbull Steel Co. v. Routzhan (D. C.) 292 Fed. 1009, and American Laundry, etc., Co. v. Dean (D. C.) 292 Fed. 620, furnish sufficient reasons for affirming this judgment, with costs, without further discussion.
Judgment affirmed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowers v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 297 F. 225, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 3883, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2814, 4 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 3883 (2d Cir. 1924).
297 F. 225 (Bowers v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lake Superior District Power Co. v. Public Service Commission
26 N.W.2d 278 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1947)
W. T. Grant Co. v. Duggan
94 F.2d 859 (Second Circuit, 1938)
W. T. Grant Co. v. Duggan
18 F. Supp. 724 (S.D. New York, 1937)
Watts v. United States
82 F.2d 266 (Second Circuit, 1936)
Cuba Railroad v. United States
60 Ct. Cl. 272 (Court of Claims, 1925)