Bowers v. Vial

78 A.D.2d 534, 431 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12846
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1980·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 5, 1979, which is in favor of the defendants upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of all the evidence. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs. Trial Term correctly concluded that the defendants had no notice, either actual or constructive, of the slippery substance on the stairway upon which the plaintiff fell. There was a complete absence of proof as to how the substance got on the stairway or that either of the defendants or their employees created the condition (see Bogart v Woolworth Co., 24 NY2d 936, 937; Lavine v United Paper Bd. Co., 243 NY 631; Katcher v Ideal Tennis, 65 AD2d 751; Dowling v Woolworth Co., 16 AD2d 672; Donohoe v Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 277 App Div 739). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowers v. Vial, 78 A.D.2d 534, 431 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

78 A.D.2d 534 (Bowers v. Vial) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
998 F. Supp. 218 (E.D. New York, 1998)
Quarles v. Columbia Sussex Corp.
997 F. Supp. 327 (E.D. New York, 1998)
Huth v. Allied Maintenance Corp.
143 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Goldstein v. C. W. Post Center of Long Island University
122 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)