Bowers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bowers v. State

1919 OK CR 251, 183 P. 432, 16 Okla. Crim. 699, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 235

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 19, 1919

DocketNo. A-3342.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 251 (Bowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowers v. State, 1919 OK CR 251, 183 P. 432, 16 Okla. Crim. 699, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 235 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been pending in. this court since the .'10th day of April, 1918. On the 7th day of.June, 1919 the case was called for submission. No appearance was made at that time by counsel representing plaintiff in error to orally argue the cause nor has any brief been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error. At the time the cause was submitted the Attorney General filed a motion to affirm the same for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal.

It is apparent that this appeal has been abandoned. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal is sustained and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been pending in. this court since the .'10th day of April, 1918. On the 7th day of.June, 1919 the case was called for submission. No appearance was made at that time by counsel representing plaintiff in error to orally argue the cause nor has any brief been filed in behalf of plaintiff in error. At the time the cause was submitted the Attorney General filed a motion to affirm the same for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal.

It is apparent that this appeal has been abandoned. The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to diligently prosecute the appeal is sustained and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 251, 183 P. 432, 16 Okla. Crim. 699, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.