Bowers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bowers v. State

1914 OK CR 75, 140 P. 1194, 10 Okla. Crim. 682, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 1, 1914

DocketNo. A-1971.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 75 (Bowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowers v. State, 1914 OK CR 75, 140 P. 1194, 10 Okla. Crim. 682, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Walter Bowers, was convicted at the February, 1913, term of the county court of Rogers country on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $250 and imprisonment for sixty days. The appeal was taken to this court on the 18th day of April, 1913, and the cause submitted in this court for final determination on the 5th day of March, 1914. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument. The assistant Attorney General, on the hearing, moved for an affirmance of this ■ cause on the ground that the appeal had been abandoned. We have examined the record and find no error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Walter Bowers, was convicted at the February, 1913, term of the county court of Rogers country on a charge of selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $250 and imprisonment for sixty days. The appeal was taken to this court on the 18th day of April, 1913, and the cause submitted in this court for final determination on the 5th day of March, 1914. No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument. The assistant Attorney General, on the hearing, moved for an affirmance of this ■ cause on the ground that the appeal had been abandoned. We have examined the record and find no error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 75, 140 P. 1194, 10 Okla. Crim. 682, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.