Bowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bowers v. State

835 So. 2d 341, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 279, 2003 WL 131629

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 2003

DocketNo. 1D01-4088

StatusPublished

This text of 835 So. 2d 341 (Bowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowers v. State, 835 So. 2d 341, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 279, 2003 WL 131629 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This direct appeal of the appellant’s judgment and sentence, imposed after the appellant was found guilty of violating the conditions of his supervision, was filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the revocation of probation but reverse the written order and remand for the trial court to enter a corrected revocation order that comports with its oral findings that the appellant violated only the condition of probation requiring him to report. See Gordon v. State, 827 So.2d 346, 2002 WL 31174261 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.2, 2002).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

BARFIELD, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This direct appeal of the appellant’s judgment and sentence, imposed after the appellant was found guilty of violating the conditions of his supervision, was filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the revocation of probation but reverse the written order and remand for the trial court to enter a corrected revocation order that comports with its oral findings that the appellant violated only the condition of probation requiring him to report. See Gordon v. State, 827 So.2d 346, 2002 WL 31174261 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct.2, 2002).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

BARFIELD, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

835 So. 2d 341, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 279, 2003 WL 131629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack