Bowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bowers v. State

188 So. 2d 382, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5093

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1966·No. No. 66-34·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record for breaking and entry with intent to commit a felony, and grand larceny. He waived jury trial and was found guilty on both charges by the trial judge, adjudicated and sentenced accordingly.

We have examined the errors urged by the appellant and, following a review of the record, we affirm. See: Clifton v. [383]*383State, 26 Fla. 523, 7 So. 863; Walker v. State, 44 Fla. 466, 32 So. 954; Walker v. State, 152 Fla. 455, 13 So.2d 4; Channell v. State, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 284; Montgomery v. State, Fla. 1965, 176 So.2d 331.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was informed against in the Criminal Court of Record for breaking and entry with intent to commit a felony, and grand larceny. He waived jury trial and was found guilty on both charges by the trial judge, adjudicated and sentenced accordingly.

We have examined the errors urged by the appellant and, following a review of the record, we affirm. See: Clifton v. [383]*383State, 26 Fla. 523, 7 So. 863; Walker v. State, 44 Fla. 466, 32 So. 954; Walker v. State, 152 Fla. 455, 13 So.2d 4; Channell v. State, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 284; Montgomery v. State, Fla. 1965, 176 So.2d 331.

Affirmed.

Bowers v. State, 188 So. 2d 382, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5093 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

188 So. 2d 382 (Bowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related