Bowers v. Henry Steers, Inc.

Second Circuit

Bowers v. Henry Steers, Inc.

241 F. 377, 154 C.C.A. 257, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1775

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 13, 1917

DocketNo. 216

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 241 F. 377 (Bowers v. Henry Steers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowers v. Henry Steers, Inc., 241 F. 377, 154 C.C.A. 257, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1775 (2d Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

May 16, 1916, after a jury was impaneled in this case, counsel agreed to try the cause before the court without a jury, [378]*378which was accordingly discharged. Subsequently, May 24th, the court handed down an opinion and entered an order, in which a verdict was directed for the defendant and that the defendant have judgment accordingly.

[1, 2] The trial of civil actions at law by the court without a jury is not regulated by the state practice, but by section 649 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. 1916, § 1587), which reads as follows:

“Issues of fact in civil cases in any Circuit Court may he tried and determined by the court, without the intervention of a jury, wherever the parties, or their attorneys of record, file with the clerk a stipulation in writing waiving a jury. The finding of the court upon the facts, which may be either general or special, shall have the same effect as the verdict of a jury.”

When it does not appear by the transcript of record that a jury was waived by a stipulation in writing filed with the clerk, the judgment, although valid, because the judge is regarded as sitting as an arbitrator, cannot be reviewed by writ of error, except for error appearing on the face of the pleadings or of the judgment itself. Bond v. Dustin, 112 U. S. 604, 5 Sup. Ct. 296, 28 L. Ed. 835; Dundee Mortgage Co. v. Hughes, 124 U. S. 157, 8 Sup. Ct. 377, 31 L. Ed. 357; Andes v. Slauson, 130 U. S. 435, 9 Sup. Ct. 573, 32 L. Ed. 989; Spalding v. Manasse, 131 U. S. 65, 9 Sup. Ct. 649, 33 L. Ed. 86.

As no reviewable error appears in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

May 16, 1916, after a jury was impaneled in this case, counsel agreed to try the cause before the court without a jury, [378]*378which was accordingly discharged. Subsequently, May 24th, the court handed down an opinion and entered an order, in which a verdict was directed for the defendant and that the defendant have judgment accordingly.

[1, 2] The trial of civil actions at law by the court without a jury is not regulated by the state practice, but by section 649 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. 1916, § 1587), which reads as follows:

“Issues of fact in civil cases in any Circuit Court may he tried and determined by the court, without the intervention of a jury, wherever the parties, or their attorneys of record, file with the clerk a stipulation in writing waiving a jury. The finding of the court upon the facts, which may be either general or special, shall have the same effect as the verdict of a jury.”

When it does not appear by the transcript of record that a jury was waived by a stipulation in writing filed with the clerk, the judgment, although valid, because the judge is regarded as sitting as an arbitrator, cannot be reviewed by writ of error, except for error appearing on the face of the pleadings or of the judgment itself. Bond v. Dustin, 112 U. S. 604, 5 Sup. Ct. 296, 28 L. Ed. 835; Dundee Mortgage Co. v. Hughes, 124 U. S. 157, 8 Sup. Ct. 377, 31 L. Ed. 357; Andes v. Slauson, 130 U. S. 435, 9 Sup. Ct. 573, 32 L. Ed. 989; Spalding v. Manasse, 131 U. S. 65, 9 Sup. Ct. 649, 33 L. Ed. 86.

As no reviewable error appears in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 F. 377, 154 C.C.A. 257, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-henry-steers-inc-ca2-1917.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack