Bowers v. Hadassah

31 Ohio Law Rep. 9
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 7, 1965
Docket38893
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ohio Law Rep. 9 (Bowers v. Hadassah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowers v. Hadassah, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 9 (Ohio 1965).

Opinion

Matthias, Judge.

In order for a succession to be exempt from taxation under the provision of Section 5731.09, Revised Code, that it is “to or for the use of an institution only of public charity, carried on in whole or in a substantial part within this state,” (1) it must be to or for the use of an institution for the purposes only of public charity, and (2) such public charity must be carried on in whole or in a substantial part within this state. (In re Estate of Bremer, 166 OhioSt. 233, 239, 2 O.O.(2d) 56, approved and followed.)

Judgment affirmed.

[10]*10Taft, C. J., Smith, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., not participating. Smith, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Zimmerman, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ohio Law Rep. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-hadassah-ohio-1965.