Bower's v. Glendening

4 Munf. 219, 18 Va. 219, 1814 Va. LEXIS 29
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 17, 1814·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Judge Roane

pronounced the court’s opinion as follows : — “The court, not perceiving that there was any fraud or collusion on the part of the appellant, in defending the suit brought against him, ás executor of Peter Bower, by Michael Bower, in the County Court of Stafford, among the proceedings, which should bar his recovery against the appellees in the present suit, is of opinion that the said decree is erroneous. Therefore it Is decreed and ordered that the same be reversed; and that $lie cause be remanded to the said Court of Chancery for the purpose of decreeing against the appellees their rateable proportions of the debt in question, according to the principles and usages of equity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bower's v. Glendening, 4 Munf. 219, 18 Va. 219, 1814 Va. LEXIS 29 (Va. 1814).

4 Munf. 219 (Bower's v. Glendening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClung v. Sieg
46 S.E. 210 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1903)
Ralphsnyder v. Ralphsnyders
17 W. Va. 28 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)
Moore v. Lesueur
33 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Evans v. Spurgin
11 Gratt. 615 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1854)
Davis v. Newman
40 Am. Dec. 764 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1844)
Wilcocks v. Phillips
29 F. Cas. 1198 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1843)
Lee of Daniel v. Cooke
1 Va. 396 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1794)