Bowers v. Fitzrandolph
1 Add. 215
This text of 1 Add. 215 (Bowers v. Fitzrandolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowers v. Fitzrandolph, 1 Add. 215 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1794).
Opinion
Whether the dog was mad or not, he having bitten Fitzrandolph, the killing of him is justifiable. The dog was a nuisance: and every man may abate a nuisance. This is not the case of a dog set to guard property, and killed by a person interfering improperly. Such killing would not be justifiable.
The jury found a verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Add. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-fitzrandolph-pactcomplallegh-1794.