Bowers v. Fitzrandolph
1 Add. 215
Opinion
Whether the dog was mad or not, he having bitten Fitzrandolph, the killing of him is justifiable. The dog was a nuisance: and every man may abate a nuisance. This is not the case of a dog set to guard property, and killed by a person interfering improperly. Such killing would not be justifiable.
The jury found a verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowers v. Fitzrandolph, 1 Add. 215 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1794).
1 Add. 215 (Bowers v. Fitzrandolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.