Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bowers v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Bowers v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

458 So. 2d 1144, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15830
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1991
StatusPublished

This text of 458 So. 2d 1144 (Bowers v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowers v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 458 So. 2d 1144, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15830 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is not the function of the appellate court to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court through reevaluation of the testimony and evidence. Finding that the judgment of the trial court is supported by competent evidence, we affirm. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So.2d 203, 206 (Fla.1983); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13, 16 (Fla.1976); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla.3d DCA 1982); Oceanic International Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuvin v. Kuvin
442 So. 2d 203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.
418 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Oceanic Intern. Corp. v. Lantana Boatyard
402 So. 2d 507 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 1144, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2250, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-fidelity-casualty-co-of-new-york-fladistctapp-1984.