Bowers v. Dean
This text of 1 S.E.2d 655 (Bowers v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the evidence introduced, including the positively verified petition, the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a'n interlocutory injunction. Sapp v. Ritch, 169 Ga. 33 (3) (149 S. E. 636) ; Volunteer State Life Ins. Co. v. Chapman, 173 Ga. 633 (160 S. E. 783) ; Roberts v. Roberts, 180 Ga. 671 (3) (180 S. E. 491) ; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Gunn, 185 Ga. 108 (4) (194 S. E. 365) ; Simon v. Simon. 185 Ga. 385 (195 S. E. 430). Judgment atffvnned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 S.E.2d 655, 187 Ga. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-dean-ga-1939.