Bowers v. Dean

1 S.E.2d 655, 187 Ga. 700
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 17, 1939
DocketNo. 12682
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 S.E.2d 655 (Bowers v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowers v. Dean, 1 S.E.2d 655, 187 Ga. 700 (Ga. 1939).

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

Under the evidence introduced, including the positively verified petition, the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting a'n interlocutory injunction. Sapp v. Ritch, 169 Ga. 33 (3) (149 S. E. 636) ; Volunteer State Life Ins. Co. v. Chapman, 173 Ga. 633 (160 S. E. 783) ; Roberts v. Roberts, 180 Ga. 671 (3) (180 S. E. 491) ; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Gunn, 185 Ga. 108 (4) (194 S. E. 365) ; Simon v. Simon. 185 Ga. 385 (195 S. E. 430). Judgment atffvnned.

All the Justices conour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leger v. Ken Edwards Enterprises, Inc.
156 S.E.2d 651 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Grizzel v. Grizzel
3 S.E.2d 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.E.2d 655, 187 Ga. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-dean-ga-1939.