Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided March 14, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-06024·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN OHIO DISTRICT EASTERN DIVISION Angela A.B., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:20-cv-6024 Judge Sarah D. Morrison v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Objections filed by the Plaintiff Angela A.B. (ECF No. 28) to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Commissioner denying benefits be affirmed. (ECF No. 27). Pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, after a de novo and careful determination of the record, the Court concludes that the decision of the Commissioner “is supported by substantial evidence and was made pursuant to proper legal standards.” Rogers v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 486 F. 3d 234, 241 (6th Cir. 2007). The issues raised in the Plaintiff’s Objections have been considered and correctly addressed by the Magistrate Judge. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 27.) The decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits in this case is AFFIRMED. Judgment shall be rendered in favor of the Commissioner. The Clerk shall terminate this case from the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Sarah D. Morrison SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ohio 2022).

Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security (Bowers v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
486 F.3d 234 (Sixth Circuit, 2007)