Bowers v. City of East Orange

86 A. 429, 81 N.J. Eq. 207, 11 Buchanan 207, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 328

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 3, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

The decree is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion in Bowers v. Bloomfield, just decided, ante p. 168.

[208]*208For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swaxze, Trenchard, Bergen,- Mjnturn, Kalisoh, Bogbrt, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, TRBACX — 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowers v. City of East Orange, 86 A. 429, 81 N.J. Eq. 207, 11 Buchanan 207, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 1913).

Pincite

86 A. 429 (Bowers v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.