Bowers v. City of East Orange

86 A. 429, 81 N.J. Eq. 207, 11 Buchanan 207, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 328
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 3, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 86 A. 429 (Bowers v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowers v. City of East Orange, 86 A. 429, 81 N.J. Eq. 207, 11 Buchanan 207, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 328 (N.J. 1913).

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiam.

The decree is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion in Bowers v. Bloomfield, just decided, ante p. 168.

[208]*208For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swaxze, Trenchard, Bergen,- Mjnturn, Kalisoh, Bogbrt, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, TRBACX — 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ricky Ensley v. the State of Texas
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A. 429, 81 N.J. Eq. 207, 11 Buchanan 207, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-city-of-east-orange-nj-1913.