Bowers v. Chippewa Circuit Judge
This text of 99 N.W. 394 (Bowers v. Chippewa Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question presented is whether, under 'Chancery Bule 16, which authorizes an amendment to a bill of complaint at any time before plea, answer, or demurrer is put in, without leave of court, a bill may be .amended in a pro confesso case after the time limited for .appearance.
We are of the opinion that the rule covers such a case. The defendant, in making default, does so with full knowledge that the rule permits the amendment. The circuit judge refused to recognize such an amendment in the present case. In this he erred.
The writ is granted, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.W. 394, 136 Mich. 367, 1904 Mich. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-chippewa-circuit-judge-mich-1904.