Bowers v. Carl Schoen Silk Corp.
16 F.2d 1014, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3969
This text of 16 F.2d 1014 (Bowers v. Carl Schoen Silk Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bowers v. Carl Schoen Silk Corp., 16 F.2d 1014, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3969 (2d Cir. 1926).
Opinion
We see no reason to depart from the result of decisions already made. See United States v. Semple (C. C. A.) 10 F.(2d) 1023; Curtis, etc., v. United States, Court of Claims No. 83, October term, 1926.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F.2d 1014, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowers-v-carl-schoen-silk-corp-ca2-1926.