Bowers v. Beatty

201 N.C. 352
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 23, 1931·Published

Opinion

Pee, Curiam:.

Conceding, without deciding, that, under authority of Odum v. Clark, 146 N. C., 544, 60 S. E., 513, and the evidence appearing of record, the court erroneously directed an answer to the fifth issue, nevertheless, unless there were error also in respect to the third or fourth issue, which has not been made to appear, a new trial would avail the plaintiffs nothing.

[354]*354Tbe validity of tbe intervener’s mortgage, duly executed and registered in Chesterfield County, S. C., and also registered in Beaufort County, N. C., is supported by wbat is said in Hornthal v. Burwell, 109 N. C., 10, 13 S. E., 721, and 5 R. C. L., 399.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowers v. Beatty, 201 N.C. 352 (N.C. 1931).

201 N.C. 352 (Bowers v. Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Odom v. . Clark
60 S.E. 513 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)
Hornthal v. . Burwell
13 S.E. 721 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)