Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc.

320 F.3d 1316

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 2003

DocketNos. 01-1108, 01-1109

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 320 F.3d 1316 (Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc., 320 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ON COMBINED PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellant1, a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Cross-Appellant, and the petition for panel rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response and amici curiae brief having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing is granted.

(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

(3) In view of the panel’s revised opinion, the court vacates the panel’s judgment and original opinion entered August 20, 2002, Harold L. Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, Inc., 302 F.3d 1334 (Fed.Cir.2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI