Bower's Appeal

68 Pa. 126
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 8, 1871·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

Nothing can with advantage be added to the learned opinion filed in this case. As far as there was any question of the rights of married women involved in the case, the opinion is a true exposition of them under the law. So also is it of a mortgagor, claiming exemption out of the surplus money made on a sale on a mortgage as against subsequent judgment-creditors. It affirms the right on the several authorities cited by him. We therefore affirm the distribution made, excepting in a single almost immaterial respect, to which the attention of the court below was evidently not called, as seems to be admitted by the appellant; nor is it properly assigned for error here, although we think it is nevertheless error, namely: As Richards’s judgment and Elizabeth Bower’s judgment against Joseph Bower, the debtor, bear date the same day, any money applicable to either, ought to have been applied pro raid to each. If this be the fact the court can make the correction.

With this modification the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bower's Appeal, 68 Pa. 126 (Pa. 1871).

68 Pa. 126 (Bower's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dollar Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sigler
74 Pa. D. & C.2d 192 (Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas, 1976)
Lithgow v. Taylor
16 Pa. D. & C. 390 (Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, 1931)
Appeal of Miller
15 A. 672 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1888)