Bower v. Howard

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Bower v. Howard

108 R.I. 906

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 12, 1971

DocketM. P. No. 1253

StatusPublished

This text of 108 R.I. 906 (Bower v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bower v. Howard, 108 R.I. 906 (R.I. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Respondent directed to file answer to petition for habeas corpus and show cause, if any he has, why writ should not issue, the answer to comply with Provisional Order No. 7. Motion for appointment ■ of special counsel denied, no cause having been shown that services of the Public-Defender were unsatisfactory.

Richard S. Bower, petitioner; pro se. Herbert F. DeSimone', Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent directed to file answer to petition for habeas corpus and show cause, if any he has, why writ should not issue, the answer to comply with Provisional Order No. 7. Motion for appointment ■ of special counsel denied, no cause having been shown that services of the Public-Defender were unsatisfactory.

Richard S. Bower, petitioner; pro se. Herbert F. DeSimone', Attorney General, for respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 R.I. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bower-v-howard-ri-1971.