Bower v. Howard

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Bower v. Howard

108 R.I. 906

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 12, 1971·No. M. P. No. 1253·Published

Opinion

Respondent directed to file answer to petition for habeas corpus and show cause, if any he has, why writ should not issue, the answer to comply with Provisional Order No. 7. Motion for appointment ■ of special counsel denied, no cause having been shown that services of the Public-Defender were unsatisfactory.

Richard S. Bower, petitioner; pro se. Herbert F. DeSimone', Attorney General, for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent directed to file answer to petition for habeas corpus and show cause, if any he has, why writ should not issue, the answer to comply with Provisional Order No. 7. Motion for appointment ■ of special counsel denied, no cause having been shown that services of the Public-Defender were unsatisfactory.

Richard S. Bower, petitioner; pro se. Herbert F. DeSimone', Attorney General, for respondent.

Bower v. Howard, 108 R.I. 906 (R.I. 1971).

Pincite

108 R.I. 906 (Bower v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.