Bowens v. Board of Law Examiners of State of N.C.
This text of 804 F.2d 1250 (Bowens v. Board of Law Examiners of State of N.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
804 F.2d 1250
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry Dean BOWENS, D. Lester Diggs, Clifton Edward Graves,
Jr., Earl Frederick Jones, G. Angaza
Laughinghouse, Emery L. Rann, III, and
Marion Weaver, Appellants,
v.
The Board of Law Examiners of the State of North Carolina:
Horace E. Stacy, Jr., Individually and in his representative
capacity as Chairman of the Board of Law Examiners of the
State of N.C., W.H. McElwee, Walter R. McGuire, Francis I.
Parker, Eric C. Michaux, James Mullen, C. Edwin Allman, John
T. Allred, John D. Warlick, Jr., James L. Nelson and Arch
Schoch, Jr., Individually and in their representative
capacities as members of the Board of Law Examiners of the
State of N.C., and Fred P. Parker, III, Individually and in
his official capacity as Executive Secretary to the Board of
Law Examiners of the State of N.C., Appellees.
No. 86-1511.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 30, 1986.
Decided Nov. 12, 1986.
Larry Dean Bowens, D. Lester Diggs, Clifton Edward Graves, Jr., Earl Frederick Jones, G. Angaza Laughinghouse, Emery L. Rann, III, Marion Weaver, appellants pro se.
E. Osborne Ayscue, Jr., Helms, Mulliss, Johnston, for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. F.T. Dupree, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 82-1224-CIV-5)
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from the court's order denying relief is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Bowens v. Board of Law Examiners, C/A No. 82-1224-CIV-5 (E.D.N.C., Jan. 6, 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
804 F.2d 1250, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33504, 1986 WL 16155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowens-v-board-of-law-examiners-of-state-of-nc-ca4-1986.