Bowen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bowen v. State

516 S.W.3d 452, 2017 WL 1485560, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 329

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104112

StatusPublished

This text of 516 S.W.3d 452 (Bowen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowen v. State, 516 S.W.3d 452, 2017 WL 1485560, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 329 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Maurice Bowen (Movant) appeals the judgment of the circuit court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Mov-ant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to approach the prosecutor during trial to offer a guilty plea in exchange for a ten-year sentence. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Maurice Bowen (Movant) appeals the judgment of the circuit court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Mov-ant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to approach the prosecutor during trial to offer a guilty plea in exchange for a ten-year sentence. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 S.W.3d 452, 2017 WL 1485560, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-state-moctapp-2017.