Bowen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bowen v. State

179 S.E. 775, 51 Ga. App. 191, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 622

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 26, 1935

Docket24289

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 S.E. 775 (Bowen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowen v. State, 179 S.E. 775, 51 Ga. App. 191, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 622 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

GtUBBRY, J.

“Where in a bastardy proceeding it appeared from the evidence that birth had taken place, but it was not shown that the mother had recovered or that the expense of her confinement would not become a charge against the county, an order of the magistrate requiring bond in terms of the statute was not illegal because it included security for such expense; and upon the subsequent trial of the defendant for the alleged criminal offense of refusing to give the bond as required, it was no defense that as a matter of fact the mother had fully recovered and the expense of her confinement had been paid by relatives, at the time of the hearing before the magistrate.” Bowen v. State, 180 Ga. 497 (179 S. E. 352).

2. The assignments of error in the motion for a new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Maelntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GtUBBRY, J.

“Where in a bastardy proceeding it appeared from the evidence that birth had taken place, but it was not shown that the mother had recovered or that the expense of her confinement would not become a charge against the county, an order of the magistrate requiring bond in terms of the statute was not illegal because it included security for such expense; and upon the subsequent trial of the defendant for the alleged criminal offense of refusing to give the bond as required, it was no defense that as a matter of fact the mother had fully recovered and the expense of her confinement had been paid by relatives, at the time of the hearing before the magistrate.” Bowen v. State, 180 Ga. 497 (179 S. E. 352).

2. The assignments of error in the motion for a new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Maelntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 775, 51 Ga. App. 191, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-state-gactapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack