Bowen v. State
This text of 151 So. 3d 548 (Bowen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the appellant challenges his convictions for burglary of a structure or conveyance and burglary of a dwelling or structure with damages in excess of $1,000. We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences without comment. However, because the appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal prior to filing his motions to withdraw plea, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter an order dismissing, not denying, appellant’s pro se motions to withdraw plea. See Adkinson v. State, 36 So.3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).
Judgment and sentence AFFIRMED; order denying motion to withdraw plea REVERSED with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 So. 3d 548, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19600, 2014 WL 6765674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.