Bowen v. Schackter

65 A. 1117, 73 N.J.L. 818, 44 Vroom 818, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 142
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 2, 1907·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Swayze, in the Supreme Court, reported in 43 Vroom 441, the judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Garrets on, Hendrickson, Pitney, Reed, Trench akd, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowen v. Schackter, 65 A. 1117, 73 N.J.L. 818, 44 Vroom 818, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 142 (N.J. 1907).

65 A. 1117 (Bowen v. Schackter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowen v. Shackter
60 A. 1111 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1905)