Bowen v. King Bros. & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bowen v. King Bros. & Co.

80 S.E. 696, 14 Ga. App. 319, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 243

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 27, 1914

Docket5332

StatusPublished

This text of 80 S.E. 696 (Bowen v. King Bros. & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bowen v. King Bros. & Co., 80 S.E. 696, 14 Ga. App. 319, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Roan, J.

This being a suit to recover money alleged to have been cob lected by a laborer after having assigned his wages to the plaintiffs, and no written assignment being in evidence, and it appearing, from the uncontradieted evidence, that the'wages assigned were unearned at the time of the alleged assignment, the assignment was void under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 3465, and the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover. The certiorari should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roan, J.

This being a suit to recover money alleged to have been cob lected by a laborer after having assigned his wages to the plaintiffs, and no written assignment being in evidence, and it appearing, from the uncontradieted evidence, that the'wages assigned were unearned at the time of the alleged assignment, the assignment was void under the provisions of the Civil Code, § 3465, and the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover. The certiorari should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 S.E. 696, 14 Ga. App. 319, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-king-bros-co-gactapp-1914.