Bowen v. Davis
This text of 199 S.E.2d 640 (Bowen v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
"A valid filing of a transcript of evidence prepared [380]*380from recollection requires the agreement of the parties or their counsel thereon, or, in case of the inability of the parties to agree as to the correctness of such transcript, the decision of the trial court.” Liberty Loan &c. Corp. v. Meeks, 115 Ga. App. 846 (3) (156 SE2d 172). In this automobile collision action the plaintiff, in order to prevail, had the burden of proving the negligence of the defendant and the amount of damages. The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, apparently on the theory that one or both of these elements had not been proved. The case was not reported, the parties failed to agree on a transcript, and the trial court certified he could not recall the evidence. In the absence of a transcript there is no way for this court to determine whether or not the plaintiff proved the essential elements of his case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 S.E.2d 640, 129 Ga. App. 379, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-davis-gactapp-1973.