Bowen v. Bowen
38 So. 3d 220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8916, 2010 WL 2472270
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Grafman v. Grafman, 488 So.2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (holding that order entered in post-judgment proceeding that contemplated further judicial labor was not reviewable pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(4)); T.H. v. Department of Children and Families, 736 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding order was nonfinal where order reserved jurisdiction to determine issues integrally related to those issues resolved by order [221]*221on appeal even though issues had not been specifically pled by the parties).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bowen v. Bowen, 38 So. 3d 220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8916, 2010 WL 2472270 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
38 So. 3d 220 (Bowen v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grafman v. Grafman
488 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Th v. Department of Children & Fam.
736 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)