Bowen v. Bowen

38 So. 3d 220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8916, 2010 WL 2472270
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 2010
DocketNo. 1D10-0671
StatusPublished

This text of 38 So. 3d 220 (Bowen v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowen v. Bowen, 38 So. 3d 220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8916, 2010 WL 2472270 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Grafman v. Grafman, 488 So.2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (holding that order entered in post-judgment proceeding that contemplated further judicial labor was not reviewable pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(4)); T.H. v. Department of Children and Families, 736 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding order was nonfinal where order reserved jurisdiction to determine issues integrally related to those issues resolved by order [221]*221on appeal even though issues had not been specifically pled by the parties).

DAVIS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grafman v. Grafman
488 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Th v. Department of Children & Fam.
736 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 So. 3d 220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8916, 2010 WL 2472270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowen-v-bowen-fladistctapp-2010.