Bowden v. State

937 So. 2d 1253, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16459, 2006 WL 2785517
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 2006·No. No. 5D06-2491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because an issue regarding a sentence that purportedly exceeds the terms of a plea is not a sentencing error that is subject to relief under rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, we affirm. Cf. Barber v. State, 901 So.2d 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bowden v. State, 937 So. 2d 1253, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16459, 2006 WL 2785517 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

937 So. 2d 1253 (Bowden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldsmith v. State
937 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)