Bowden v. State

925 S.W.2d 158, 325 Ark. 95, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 371
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJune 21, 1996
DocketCR 95-1258
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 925 S.W.2d 158 (Bowden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bowden v. State, 925 S.W.2d 158, 325 Ark. 95, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 371 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lamont Bowden, has been convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. His attorney, Ronald Carey Nichols, requested and was granted a thirty-day extension to February 14, 1996, to file appellant’s brief. On February 14, 1996, he was given a second thirty-day extension, making the brief due on March 15, 1996. On March 19, 1996, appellant’s attorney was granted a third extension to April 14, 1996. A final extension to April 28, 1996, was then given to file the appellant’s brief, but no brief has been filed.

Ronald Carey Nichols is therefore ordered to appear before this court on the 1st day of July, 1996, at 9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this court for his repeated failures to file appellant’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dugger v. State
94 S.W.3d 924 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 S.W.2d 158, 325 Ark. 95, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bowden-v-state-ark-1996.