Bowden v. City Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bowden v. City Savings Bank

151 S.E. 481, 169 Ga. 641, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 424

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1929·No. No. 6977·Published

Opinion

This case, on exception to the sustaining of a general demurrer filed by the defendant, coming on for decision by all of the Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Atkinson, Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., holding the contrary view, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed by operation of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case, on exception to the sustaining of a general demurrer filed by the defendant, coming on for decision by all of the Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Russell, C. J., Beck, P. J., and Hill, J., being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed, and Atkinson, Gilbert, and Hines, JJ., holding the contrary view, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed by operation of law.

Bowden v. City Savings Bank, 151 S.E. 481, 169 Ga. 641, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 424 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

151 S.E. 481 (Bowden v. City Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.